Early Archean spherule beds of possible impact origin from Barberton, South Africa: A detailed mineralogical and geochemical study

The Barberton Greenstone belt is a 3.5- to 3.2-Ga-old formation situated in the Swaziland Supergroup near Barberton, northeast Transvaal, South Africa. The belt includes a lower, predominantly volcanic sequence, and an upper sedimentary sequence (e.g., the Fig Tree Group). Within this upper sedimentary sequence, Lowe and Byerly identified a series of different beds of spherules with diameters of around 0.5-2 mm. Lowe and Byerly and Lowe et al. have interpreted these spherules to be condensates of rock vapor produced by large meteorite impacts in the early Archean. We have collected a series of samples from drill cores from the Mt. Morgan and Princeton sections near Barberton, as well as samples taken from underground exposures in the Sheba and Agnes mines. These samples seem much better preserved than the surface samples described by Lowe and Byerly and Lowe et al. Over a scale of just under 30 cm, several well-defined spherule beds are visible, interspaced with shales and/or layers of banded iron formation. Some spherules have clearly been deposited on top of a sedimentary unit because the shale layer shows indentions from the overlying spherules. Although fresher than the surface samples (e.g., spherule bed S-2), there is abundant evidence for extensive alteration, presumably by hydrothermal processes. In some sections of the cores sulfide mineralization is common. For our mineralogical and petrographical studies we have prepared detailed thin sections of all core and underground samples (as well as some surface samples from the S-2 layer for comparison). For geochemical work, layers with thicknesses in the order of 1-5 mm were separated from selected core and underground samples. The chemical analyses are being performed using neutron activation analysis in order to obtain data for about 35 trace elements in each sample. Major elements are being determined by XRF and plasma spectrometry. To clarify the history of the sulfide mineralization, sulfur isotopic compositions are being determined

Manson impact structure, Iowa: First geochemical results for drill core M-1

The Manson Impact Structure is a large complex impact crater centered ca. S km north of the town of Manson, Iowa. It is the largest intact impact structure recognized in the United States (35 km in diameter). Its Ar-40/Ar-39 age is indistinguishable from that of the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary. The Manson structure may be one element of the events at the K-T boundary. The crater is completely covered by Quaternary glacial sedimentary deposits that are normally underlain by Cretaceous clastic sediments and flat-lying carbonate sediments of Phanerozoic age, as well as Proterozoic red clastic, metamorphic, volcanic, and plutonic rock sequences. The study of a reflection seismic profile, provided by Amoco, was critical in interpreting the structure. In the 35 km diameter zone that marks the extension of the crater the normal rock sequence is disturbed due to the impact, and at the center of the structure granitic basement rocks are present that have been uplifted from about 4 km depth. Our studies consist of detailed petrological and geochemical characterization of all cores, with emphasis on a detailed description of all rock types found in the core samples and their relationship to target rocks. Geochemical data on samples from the Manson M-1 core are presented

The TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model and Terrestrial Impact Structures

We utilized the TanDEM-X digital elevation model (DEM) for investigating the complete record of confirmed terrestrial impact structures with respect to its suitability to support geological analysis. The consistently high resolution and high accuracy of this model is a prerequisite for detailed morphological studies. This DEM represents an interesting repository to aid in preparing and executing fieldwork for the exploration of new impact crater candidates. For a selection of small, mid-sized, and large impact structures, we here compare the TanDEM-X results with those from other DEMs that were derived either with synthetic aperture radar interferometry or from optical stereo pairs. Our analysis includes high-resolution mapping and the generation of detailed elevation cross sections. Only for very small impact craters, when the diameter is in the order of the pixel posting of TanDEM-X of 12 m or when the texture of the local environment does not support radar remote sensing, accurate analysis is hampered. Our results demonstrate that the high horizontal and vertical accuracies of the TanDEM-X DEM, coupled with its dense pixel grid, provide a considerable improvement in space-borne remote sensing of the complete record of simple and complex terrestrial impact structures over a wide range of diameters

Geochemical studies of impact breccias and country rocks from the El'gygytgyn impact structure, Russia

The complex impact structure El'gygytgyn (age 3.6 Ma, diameter 18 km) in northeastern Russia was formed in ~88 Ma old volcanic target rocks of the Ochotsk-Chukotsky Volcanic Belt (OCVB). In 2009, El'gygytgyn was the target of a drilling project of the International Continental Scientific Drilling Program (ICDP), and in summer 2011 it was investigated further by a Russian–German expedition. Drill core material and surface samples, including volcanic target rocks and impactites, have been investigated by various geochemical techniques in order to improve the record of trace element characteristics for these lithologies and to attempt to detect and constrain a possible meteoritic component. The bedrock units of the ICDP drill core reflect the felsic volcanics that are predominant in the crater vicinity. The overlying suevites comprise a mixture of all currently known target lithologies, dominated by felsic rocks but lacking a discernable meteoritic component based on platinum group element abundances. The reworked suevite, directly overlain by lake sediments, is not only comparatively enriched in shocked minerals and impact glass spherules, but also contains the highest concentrations of Os, Ir, Ru, and Rh compared to other El'gygytgyn impactites. This is—to a lesser extent—the result of admixture of a mafic component, but more likely the signature of a chondritic meteoritic component. However, the highly siderophile element contribution from target material akin to the mafic blocks of the ICDP drill core to the impactites remains poorly constrained

Investigação geológica na porção central da estrutura de impacto meteorítico Santa Marta, Estado do Piauí, Brasil

FAPESP - FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULOCNPQ - CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICOSanta Marta is a 10 km wide, reasonably well preserved, complex impact structure located in southwestern Piaui state, northeastern Brazil, with a central uplift of 3.2 km diameter. The Santa Marta structure was recently recognized as the sixth confirmed i474673692FAPESP - FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULOCNPQ - CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICOFAPESP - FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULOCNPQ - CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO2012/50368-1, 2012/04191-2, 2012/04191-2,166948/2013-6, 305911/2013-

Deformación y magmatismo Adakitico del intervalo Pérmico-Triásico Medio, Macizo Nordpatagónico (Argentina)

Se presentan nuevas interpretaciones sobre el escenario tectónico del Macizo Nordpatagónico (MNP) durante el intervalo Pérmico - Triásico Medio basados en la signatura geoquímica de las rocas, fases de deformación y discordancias regionales. El magmatismo Pérmico (300 – 255 Ma) del MNP coexistió con al menos tres etapas de acortamiento ocurridas a los 300 Ma, 290 Ma y entre los 265 y 260 Ma (e.g., Marcos et al. 2020). Asimismo, tanto el magmatismo como dichas etapas de deformación son progresivamente más jóvenes hacia el interior del continente, reconociéndose una migración y ensanchamiento del arco hacia el interior del MNP a partir de los 273 Ma. Además, parte de las rocas ígneas involucradas en este período muestran una variación en el contenido de Ybn e Y, consistentes con un magmatismo que varía entre rocas calcoalcalinas de arco y aquellas de signatura adakítica derivadas de la fusión de una losa oceánica. Contrariamente, el magmatismo del Pérmico tardío al Triásico Medio (253 – 244 Ma) es consistente con una etapa de erosión regional vinculada con la discordancia Huárpica (Falco et al. 2020). Asimismo, la geoquímica de estas rocas Pérmico tardío - Triásico Medio muestra afinidad de un ambiente posorogénico a intraplaca, congruente con una corteza en progresivo adelgazamiento (e.g., González et al. 2016; Lopez de Luchi et al. 2020). Las rocas más jovenes de este intervalo (∼244 Ma), tambien vinculadas a una etapa de exhumacion regional (López de Luchi et al. 2020), exhiben signatura adakitica de tipo C, derivada de la fusion de la corteza continental, interpretándose como el producto del desprendimiento de la losa y posterior subplacado basáltico (e.g., González et al. 2016). El análisis de los datos sugiere que el arco Pérmico habría coexistido con al menos tres fases de deformación, expandiéndose hacia el interior del continente resultando en un magmatismo con signatura adakítica. Estas características son consistentes con un modelo de subducción horizontal ocurrido desde el Carbonífero tardío (e.g., López de Luchi et al. 2020, Marcos et al. 2020). La transición geoquímica a un magmatismo de intraplaca y la ocurrencia de adakitas derivadas de una corteza continental, sugerirían el colapso del orógeno Gondwanico hacia el límite Pérmico-Triásico, involucrando muy posiblemente el desprendimiento de la losa. Estas observaciones indicarían que el magmatismo Pérmico-Triásico Medio en el MNP estuvo asociado al sistema subductivo del SO de Gondwana.Fil: Falco, Juan Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; ArgentinaFil: Hauser, Natalia. Universidade do Brasília; BrasilFil: Scivetti, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Instituto Patagónico de Geología y Paleontología; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur; ArgentinaFil: Reimold, Wolf Uwe. Universidade do Brasília; BrasilFil: Bechis, Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; ArgentinaFil: Folguera Telichevsky, Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Estudios Andinos "Don Pablo Groeber"; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur; ArgentinaXVIII Reunión de TectónicaSan LuisArgentinaComisión de Tectónica de la Asociación Geológica ArgentinaAsociación Geológica ArgentinaUniversidad Nacional de San Lui

2007 Barringer Medal for Christian Koeberl

The Meteoritics & Planetary Science archives are made available by the Meteoritical Society and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact [email protected] for further information.Migrated from OJS platform February 202

Terrestrial impact sites as field analogs for planetary exploration

Terrestrial impact structures provide the only analogs for hands-on astronaut training or robotic exercises in preparation for fieldwork on other planetary surfaces. Impact structures not only represent the dominant surface features on, inter alia, the Moon, Mars, or asteroids but are also crucial for basic geoscientific surface analysis, subsurface geological studies, and analysis of sites of possible exobiological evidence or economic resources for future colonization of other planetary bodies. We assess 11 terrestrial impact structures of varied age, type, size, and erosion level, the majority of which have already served for astronaut or geoscientist/student training purposes, for their suitability as possible impact geological training sites. This evaluation is achieved through a range of (1) practical criteria (such as access time and site infrastructure) and (2) geological criteria (such as impact geology, target geology, aspects of impact cratering, outcrop conditions, and variety). For the practical criteria, Ries, Rochechouart, and Steinheim score the highest, with a small advantage for Ries. Sudbury and Meteor Crater score similarly, yet much lower than the leaders, with Vredefort in between. Talemzane and Araguainha are just below Meteor Crater. Clearwater West, Haughton, and Mistastin are by far the least suitable ones. Regarding geological criteria, the scores vary much less. The three Northern Canada structures and Steinheim are at the end of the record, yet only 23%–39% below Ries, which comes out as the leader and is closely followed by Araguainha (only 2% below Ries). Although the Northern Canada sites compare in size and type to the younger and less eroded Ries and the Araguainha (older and more eroded) structures, the diversity of impact features and lithologies and the outcrop situation are less favorable. Considering only the geological features and lithologies factors, Rochechouart gets the highest mark, followed by Araguainha, Sudbury, Vredefort, and Ries. In view of the targeted objective, the analog testing experiment places Ries and Rochechouart in the first and second positions, respectively. Steinheim and Vredefort score almost the same in the third and fourth positions, respectively. The three Northern Canada sites score the lowest. Based on their accessibility, relative proximity to each other, and remarkable complementarity in terms of crater type and size, and in terms of impact and target features and lithologies, the combination of the three leading structures (Ries–Rochechouart–Steinheim) may represent the most appropriate target for analog training purposes, from anywhere in the world

Impact structures in Africa: A review

AbstractMore than 50years of space and planetary exploration and concomitant studies of terrestrial impact structures have demonstrated that impact cratering has been a fundamental process – an essential part of planetary evolution – ever since the beginning of accretion and has played a major role in planetary evolution throughout the solar system and beyond. This not only pertains to the development of the planets but to evolution of life as well. The terrestrial impact record represents only a small fraction of the bombardment history that Earth experienced throughout its evolution. While remote sensing investigations of planetary surfaces provide essential information about surface evolution and surface processes, they do not provide the information required for understanding the ultra-high strain rate, high-pressure, and high-temperature impact process. Thus, hands-on investigations of rocks from terrestrial impact craters, shock experimentation for pressure and temperature calibration of impact-related deformation of rocks and minerals, as well as parameter studies pertaining to the physics and chemistry of cratering and ejecta formation and emplacement, and laboratory studies of impact-generated lithologies are mandatory tools. These, together with numerical modeling analysis of impact physics, form the backbone of impact cratering studies.Here, we review the current status of knowledge about impact cratering – and provide a detailed account of the African impact record, which has been expanded vastly since a first overview was published in 1994. No less than 19 confirmed impact structures, and one shatter cone occurrence without related impact crater are now known from Africa. In addition, a number of impact glass, tektite and spherule layer occurrences are known. The 49 sites with proposed, but not yet confirmed, possible impact structures contain at least a considerable number of structures that, from available information, hold the promise to be able to expand the African impact record drastically – provided the political conditions for safe ground-truthing will become available. The fact that 28 structures have also been shown to date NOT to be of impact origin further underpins the strong interest in impact in Africa. We hope that this review stimulates the education of students about impact cratering and the fundamental importance of this process for Earth – both for its biological and geological evolution. This work may provide a reference volume for those workers who would like to search for impact craters and their ejecta in Africa